<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Stephens</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2004</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Evaluating research on the Feldenkrais method from the outside. Some observations and suggestions.</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>United States</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<ABSTRACT>   As we debate the process and usefullness of research within our ranks, people   are looking at us from the outside to try to evaluate the effectiveness of   what we are doing in achieving the claims that we make. One of the ways we   communicate our work is through the sharing of personal experience. Another   way is the presentation of formal research that documents the outcomes of our   work and suggests the context within which in may be most effective. This article   will review some of the criteria that people use when they look at our work   from the outside and discuss some of the conclusions about research on Feldenkrais   Method based on those criteria. We have made a good start in addressing the   outcomes of the work that we do but we have a long way to go to address the   full range of the work that we do. Suggestions are made at the end for some   next possible steps along the path of improving the research we do.</ABSTRACT>
	<NOTES><p>Stephens, Jim (2004). Evaluating research on the Feldenkrais method from the outside. Some observations and suggestions. <em>IFF Academy Research Journal</em>, 1. </p><p>www.iffresearchjournal.org&nbsp;</p></NOTES>
	<URL>http://www.iffresearchjournal.org/stephenseng.htm</URL>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>