![]() |
![]() |
» Register » Log in » Contact Us | ![]() |
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
International Feldenkrais Federation Practitioner Website | ![]() |
IFF Archive of the Feldenkrais Method | ![]() |
|
![]() | |||||||||
![]() |
« return to public site | ![]() |
![]() |
» FAQ | ![]() |
» admin | ![]() |
||
![]() | |||||||||
IFF HelpContact »IFF Webservices for assistance in registering or using the site
International Research List itemResearchVisit the Website of the
» IFF Academy Feldenkrais Research Journal NavigationRSS on the IFF sites Find out what this symbol means » here. |
Auckland, Summary of WorkshopAuckland, Summary of Workshop»
Submitted by webservices on אוקטובר 5, 2005 - 6:39PM.
Workshop Presenters:
Janie Randerson and Pamela Russell Date of workshop: November 9, 2002 - 9:00am Workshop Location: Auckland Workshop Evaluation:
SUMMARY OF GROUP RESPONSES TO PRISMA 6.2
INSTRUCTION:
Please note what it was like to observe, or have to observe, on 2 levels at once – the familiar ATM process and simultaneously the chosen criterion.
GROUP #1GROUP #2GROUP #3CHOSEN CRITERIA
· Confident and flexible to adapt · Exploration
· Connection with teacher and group · Enjoyment · Connection with teacher and group · Exploration
RESPONSES
· Playful · Extend and explore around the lesson – presented lesson as self exploration · Curiosity · Risk taking · Improvisational · Being interested · Enjoyment · Felt the connection between myself and the group stronger as I was much more aware of it · Difficult! I found the primary need was to know what was going to teach next and the criteria went out the window · Needed a longer time in order to gauge any response and rapport · When a lesson succeeds all of the criteria come together · At first difficult – content, environment, shift focus to other things · Difficult to concentrate on 2 things at once · Aware of other groups (while giving and getting) · Took time for first person to become engaged · Needed more time to get into it · Good opportunity to be less interested in the lesson getting somewhere and more in the process · Realised how much we depend on the material · Good opportunity to wing it, and experience the not having a specific foundation.
2002 11 09
SUMMARY OF GROUP RESPONSES TO PRISMA 12
Compilation of answers and outcome
Look for similarities with your perceptions during the lesson and write them down: choose one or two that interest you, and – as an additional task – observe these criteria while continuing the F.I.
GROUP #1GROUP #2GROUP #3· All observed familiarity of head and shoulder relationship· New explorations of shoulder trajectories based in previous ATM · Supported in habitual tension pattern – created breathing release · Client familiar with aspects but interested in the new challenges going on at the same time · Practitioner clear about intentions – yes, there were changes · Time limit a constraint · A moment where the lesson transformed from finding a way in, to a real connection · Threshold where lesson takes on a real sense of engagement
SUMMARY
How could the abilities just experienced be reformulated in terms of competencies? Write down what you have jointly discovered.
GROUP #1GROUP #2GROUP #3· The ability to explore movement patterns with the feeling of safety for the client· Using attentive observation to guide the process / lesson · Creating a learning environment for the client through listening to the client’s response using differentiation, breathing and a variety of constraints. · Observation of the client by practitioner i.e. breathing, swallowing · The competency of being aware of yourself, the client and the process, and the relationship (which is constantly in flux) between these. · Doing Vs being · Thinking Vs feeling
|
![]() |
|||||||